Hidden Victims of the Extended World War 1914-1945

black and white photo of starved peasants laying on a street in Kharkiv, 1933. Keywords: Famine and starvation
Starved peasants on a street in Kharkiv, 1933. (Public Domain)

The extended world war – from 1914 to 1945 – saw the greatest number of famines in the twentieth century, probably the worst concentration in world history. As the historian Cormac Ó Gráda has so painstakingly documented in his book The Hidden Victims, as many people perished from hunger during each of the two World Wars as did from direct violence. If we include the terrible famines of the so-called ‘inter-war’ period, the number is likely higher.

The World Peace Foundation catalogue of great famines and the interactive map allow us to visualize this history. An earlier blog post showed the timelines of war and famine over the last 155 years.

World War One was mostly fought in Europe and the Middle East. Hunger was a weapon used by all – arguably the outcome of the war was determined by the fact that Britain and the Entente powers starved Germany and Austria-Hungary before the German submarines could starve the British Isles. In the Middle East the war period saw famines in the Levant and Persia, while the Turkish genocide against the Armenians was accomplished to a large degree by forcing the Armenians into the desert where they died from hunger and thirst. As if the Armenians had not suffered enough, the briefly independent Armenian state also suffered famine after the war. Meanwhile, the aftermath of the Russian revolution saw the worst starvation of the entire period – a war-related famine across northern Russia and parts of southern Russia, while the new Soviet authorities commandeered grain from southern Russia and Ukraine, triggering another famine.

               

A few years later, there was a second round of vast famines between 1928-1934. In the Soviet Union, Stalin’s program of forced collectivization caused starvation across southern Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. The famines in Ukraine and Kazakhstan became genocidal as he used starvation as a weapon against the national identities of those peoples. The Ukrainian Holodomor is one of the defining events of Soviet history and of relations between the Russian and Ukrainian peoples. In China, the warlord era and civil war caused famines on a comparable scale.

World War Two witnessed some of the most appalling famines in history. In Europe, the single greatest driver was the Nazi regime’s Hungerplan. In order to feed the homeland, and not suffer the same fate as in 1918, the government extracted food from eastern Europe, the Balkans and the parts of the Soviet Union it had overrun. It also used starvation as a weapon of extermination, first against Soviet prisoners of war, then against Jewish populations, especially in Poland and Ukraine, as well as trying to starve the city of Leningrad into collapse. In western Europe, Spain suffered famine on account of Franco’s autarkic policies, worsened by the Allied blockade, that also contributed to famine in Greece.

In Asia, the patterns were different. The war caused famines in a number of distinctly different ways. The war in China was an agrarian war, with both sides using scorched earth policies. This also happened in Indonesia and the Philippines. The Japanese army lived off the land throughout all theaters of war – the red circle on Japan represents the losses to hunger among the Japanese forces themselves across the whole arena of conflict. In Bengal, the British destroyed fishing boats and crops to try to halt the Japanese advance – the damage made worse by a cyclone – and then failed to provide relief or intervene in the food markets to prevent speculative hoarding. At the war’s end, the French authorities in Vietnam failed to manage an economic crisis, causing famine, while continued fighting in Indonesia as the Allies sought to reimpose Dutch colonial rule also caused starvation.

Today’s wars have – for the most part – a different geography and a different starvation profile. There are neither great wars nor famines in east and southeast Asia nor in Europe. There are resonances between the World War One devastation of the Levant and modern war starvation in Syria, Gaza and Lebanon. There’s a war in Ukraine, in which food is weaponized and which has seen starvation sieges – notoriously so in Mariupol – but no mass hunger or genocidal starvation on anything like the scale of the 1930s and 1940s. World War X is causing hunger, but in a very different way to the 20th century’s world wars.

Kait Bell is a Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy (MALD) candidate at The Fletcher School at Tufts University, focusing on conflict studies, political communication, and design. Before Fletcher, she worked as a UN congressional advisor, a media and risk analyst specializing in the Middle East, and with a human rights coalition in Jerusalem. She holds a B.A. in Political Science and International Studies from the University of Michigan.

Alex de Waal is a Research Professor at The Fletcher School, Tufts University, and leads the WPF research programs on African Peacemaking and Mass Starvation.

Considered one of the foremost experts on the Horn of Africa, his scholarly work and practice has also probed humanitarian crisis and response, human rights, pandemic disease, and conflict and peace-building. His latest book is New Pandemics, Old Politics: Two Hundred Years of War on Disease and its Alternatives. He is also author of Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine and The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa (Polity Press, 2015)

Following a fellowship with the Global Equity Initiative at Harvard (2004-06), he worked with the Social Science Research Council as Director of the program on HIV/AIDS and Social Transformation, and led projects on conflict and humanitarian crises in Africa (2006-09). During 2005-06, de Waal was seconded to the African Union mediation team for Darfur and from 2009-11 served as senior adviser to the African Union High-Level Implementation Panel for Sudan. He was on the list of Foreign Policy’s 100 most influential public intellectuals in 2008 and Atlantic Monthly’s 27 “brave thinkers” in 2009 and is the winner of the 2024 Huxley Award of the Royal Anthropological Institute.

Professor de Waal regularly teaches a course on Conflict in Africa at the Fletcher School, Tufts University.  During this course, students should gain a deeper understanding of the nature of contemporary violent conflict in Africa. Students will be expected to master the key theoretical approaches to violence in Africa, and to become familiar with a number of important case studies. The focus is on the origins and nature of violence, rather than policy responses and solutions. The course is inter-disciplinary and involves readings in political science, international relations, and social anthropology, while also touching on economics, environmental studies, and history. 

Stay Connected

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.